Let me first dedicate this address to the Aspergian to the seminal mentor who’d given conceptive fruition to my ideological consciousness in the initial, whom I’ve been most negligent, effacing, and outright impertinent in my disrespect of, and have accordingly issued the highest of apologies pending their acceptance as of the morning of this New Year’s day, when issuing a correspondence in the stead of its spirit.
It is now the day proceeding thereforth, and although ultimately and certainly less than stalwart in punctuality, it bares the importance that not much more than a singular voice in defending the bulwark of Aspergian ideology beyond the domineering canvas of neurodiversitarian doctrinarianism which stands as a pervasively imperialistic adversary to our independence-centered goals, stands to speak on behalf of those disenfranchised by a falsely dichotomized entity as the psychiatric-neurodiversity struggle, that in actual fact is an insidiously covert and cryptic alliance that needn’t have struggled, such as it was to speak least for their secretly buoyed advantageous levy over us at the hands of political forces heightened in presidence, for its domination at all.
In thanking those who have propelled away from the meagrest, earnest and modest beginnings this anti-neurodiversitarian enclave of Aspergianism, may I extend my warmest gratitudes to those associates who’ve been newly united with me this year, and even more warmly to those amongst you who have returned, against the fray of their misgivings, to the fold. Indeed, manifold struggles have frustrated the advancement of all aspects of our cause, right down to the continued disemphasis on a style of education, as has become too insipidly noxious in insiduity in the West, conducive to the acculturation to heightened sensibilities and sentimental sensitivities a sense for the artistically-driven flair that has not merely been reduced to a quasi-scientific, post-modernistic orthodoxy of effeminately divine supremacist gynocratic sympathy-baiting penny-terrible and historically distorted hagiographies of a non-existent persecution against an always perspicaciously and brilliantly evasive and victim-playing matriarchal hegemony.
This year shall be a year in the emphasis of that all-gritty and catchily pithy quip of the imageboard’s memetic slogan, “spread the word!” But ours will have a different spin on the perspective thereof, in that we refuse to beckon to the mandate of memetic conventionality, so we must make meaningful the demographic targeting, selectively and with perceptiveness in our appeal, not befallen to the folly of mass preaching, of our plebiscitical adherents, ensuring a force less commensurate in the meaningless scale of these numbers and more in their significance as self-independently standing constituents.
In other words: the movement’s graft cannot any longer lean on popular power as its sole dependency, compelling itself a shift towards cognizant brawn in ideological consciousness, reinforced by the qualities of those so adhering. The terminal limit between quality and quantity has seen itself too rapidly fallen short, with each deceleration of our movement’s momentum. We must with more vigorous fervence rejuvenate and galvanize the propelment of our front-line ranks.
An ideological component to the movement driven by a patriotically heart-felt conviction and devotion to the fruition and cultivation of our own thoughts in the style conducive to its elucidation and clarification in a way most congruentially fitting with the grasp of our understanding and enhancement of new meta-political understandings therewith can never be under-emphasized, for it is a major tennet of Aspergian ideological practice. However, it is probably now to be just as keenly apprehended that, as refreshing and gritty as a propositionally-rooted basis in “our thoughts unto themselves” might seem, we must specialize now in more than the cognitive if it is, as David rightfully proclaims, to be a political tendency capable of gaining traction.
Cognition is but one central aspect integral to our key ideological processess. Existing within one’s headpsace an incorpereally, cognitively driven entity does not mark singly slur nor dint of defect against, and, contrarily, may serve enhancingly strengthening the morality. For, in an Aspergian conception of socio-dynamic wiles, unfettered by Hobbensian chains of felicitarian obsessive-compulsions with ‘heirarchical placement’ ala neurofeminine pathology, one’s principally integral values internalize themselves freely thereof thus. Practice of these principles, however, may stand to see themselves an impoverishment of domain, which could do everything to undermine their seeming integrity, speaking internally with respect to cognitively internalized morality, and afford us less than a position from which we may engage in advocacy our righteous convictions.
Mobilization, consolidation, orchestration, and organization of forces, motivated by a devotedly convicted zeal to carry out in application with the heighest vain and respect for preservation in every aspect of practice our principles, without respect to a misleading allure of slavish obedience that might cause us to slip into perfunctorily dreaded tedium, though nevertheless with a steadfastly striving stride towards the fullest demonstration of unbeknownst brilliance to our detractors that we could muster yet, and by whatever means — military, economic, infrastructural, and even on the smallest scales, for any possession would be seen as huge boons to the disillusionment of neurotypical contempt against us — we may procure these provisions and commissions for ourselves, then by all of them shall we endeavour to achieve, whether by dint of graft, or skin of teeth.
Thousands upon thousands, if not millions overall, across the Anglospheric morass of matriarchally bought-and-paid-for docility via. the Masonically controlled welfare-dependency apparatus, live lamentably a life of existentially meaningless dreck, whether rendered so materially, by the attraction of material accouterments, or psychopharmaceutically, by the attrition of the mental state, weakening its resolve to subdued uselessness. A pitiful lot, for a scarily universal scale of an unprecedented phenomenon in the life of the Aspergian in its post-DSM, pathogenesis-ensnared era. Our only promises to the recovery of your independently creative capacity lies in our request to you, which you’ll find in the process of doing and then having done so a necessity in hindsight: abandon your drugs, abandon the empirically brainwashing retardation dispensers of “video game console”-simulated reality, abandon that you’ve deceived to belong with among your kin, those “compatriots” amongst your family are more likely than not neuro-homogenistically mercenary sell-outs thwarting your evolutionary independence, beholden to a psychiatric manumit that has unleashed their total control against you, rendering you ceaselessly dehumanized and disassociated from the self, a “slave” in the purported illusory “freedom” of community release, upon which your psychotropic drugging may, in many cases, be predicated.
Isn’t it just ironic that in devotion to such a cause as ours, and the discipline required therein, that you may find yourself an infinitely more awakened and emancipated being than in that which you’ve endlessly rationalized as a niche for existence, used against and unto yourself in pacification? You may’ve never considered such an existence’s reality beyond the most superficial of trappings until envisaging such a wondrous beauty as that which has until now lain merely in the mind’s eye of the highly impassioned Aspergian cadres amongst your counterparts.
Though, young Aspergian, may you yet unsafely tread these damningly precarious times as they impendingly unfold. Let it be told, in relaying paylays of that already experienced by us but may not hold appeal to you in the anecdotal, so it is a game we shall play by appealing to other senses, though, not without reference to those recollections of the happenstances that had with certainty most veritably already broken.
Before I break into the self-indulgently reminiscent though, let me posit to you something of a proposal. Despite heavily enfoisted Aspergian intransigence and lassitude from the earliest days, it is insistently misstated a dangerous possession of autonomous individuality within the midst of our person’s confines, and on the basis of these proclamations, violently are attempts made to stifle and isolate us socially, breaking into a disenfranchisement of mistrust to the point of emotionally broken stir-madness ourselves, to which extent it is then wondered, rather nervefully brass-necked on the part of the purportedly “caretaking” tard-wrangler, why an acting out among our sort proceeds thereforth. To add insult to injury, in abusing an ubiquitous memetic construct, we are literally freedom-cucked, that is forced to observe that vicariously what we’ve been denied, by everyone, to the inclusion of our own kin, somehow considered infinitely more human by virtue of this lacking “protected status”; further to this insulting effrontery, those of other “protected statuses” such as the aberrosexual, and again we may witness this amongst our own supposed filial quarters, are given a putrescently pestilential tutelage over their own most revoltingly insipid sexually expressive “openness”, really a form of stomach-rendingly wretched exhibitionism by any other name, lorded over filthfully the Aspergian, who thus far, in wake of all these iniquities, find themselves, by manner of deliberation of collusion within the afore-described forces, simply further emotionally deprived. You may go and even seek resolution for your own sexual incongruities, to find yourself at lacking avail owing to a deeply embedded matriarchal agenda that, upon such a rejection, you find yourself awaken to in realization: progressivism is a franchise, for which you are to be regarded only worthy of being kept back at impasse, whilst they, salaciously, derisively, and barely able to contain their own mockingly contemptuous disdain, forge once again a justificational pretext on the basis of a misdirection rooted in purposeful over-magnification and disproportionately-blown emphasization of a so-called “condition”, such as yours, which had been entirely crafted for all the socially proscriptive and conspiratorially-induced isolating purposes to break you further to this point of regression such that they are now saying needs an even further punishing treatment: psychotropic intoxication. For being an intersectionality, as that between aberrosexual and autist, you are deemed merely deserving poison, in a way other, anointedly “pure” aberrosexuals, are “ascended” to a status of genuine political insulation, safeguarded from similar hardships.
It is the Jewish moral principle come to life. “What’s good for us, is bad for them”. A protected status as ascribed in belonging to the Asperger, does not have the same implication as those protected statuses harboured by the rest of the diversitarian franchise given affordances thereto, and therein lies the hypocritical perfidy of liberalism. You have, as an Asperger, been baited-and-switched the rigged coin-flip; yours “rights” are to the negative and predated against you, whilst theirs, and only as ever, “rights” to the universally positive politically buoyed and enfranchised. These legal codifications are merely extensions of their medical predicates, itself a fiction of a different sort, and especially when we concern ourselves with the inherently politicized apparatus of psychiatry. Medically predicated upon the constriction of all Aspergian determination on a legally sanctioned basis is the general descriptive paramaterial predicates with which it has seen its pathologization metamorphize into socially prejudicial pathogenesis — Aspergian determination is now seen only by the neurotypical regimes which preside over us as a societal plague rather than one of the many benefits of liberal egalitarianism, even if this tacit logical extrapolation is hidden under miles of insipid rhetoric, much of it enabled on both sides by the neurodiversitarian saboteurs.
It should be in our work, thus, to remove the primary dependency upon which our continued persecution perpetuates itself: integrationalism. In having been integrated within the societal monolith, so society has used its trappings, already described and elucidated in detail, to further ensnare us. If you dare try to circumvent the more egregious thereof, you are labelled an anti-social renegade and guilt-tripped into moral conformity, the speciousness therein, given the entirely “received” nature of these moralities, speaking for itself. Those who espouse to integration may well indeed preponderate the enlightened among ourselves in number, but it is worth keeping this in mind about those Aspergians who have taken it upon themselves thus: these treacherously parasitic curs have thus reneged on their status as Aspergians, resigning themselves to the rank of mere spergs, analogous to the difference between a Black and a “nigger” or “coon”. To them, they are excommunicatively disposed of so that they may not fetter the movement with their burdensomely lecherous and usurious weight, trying to play both sides of the diversitarian pantheon’s coin.
To death with the sperg, and forever shall we persevere in our upholding indigenous Aspergian values stylistically carried in manner true to the form of our pre-psychiatrized ancestral forebears, many an Aryan, Mongol hordesman, and Eurasian bearer of the racially-originating brood of evolutionarily hypermale nation — to disassociate from the endocrinally intoxicated dreck we are most often conflated with — among them.
